【カテゴリー問題】IELTSリーディングのコツ

【カテゴリー問題】IELTSリーディングのコツ

こんにちは、SOLO IELTS TOEFLのルークです。

IELTSリーディングの「カテゴリー問題」のコツを紹介します。

まれに出るタイプの問題ですね

リーディングとカテゴリー問題

IELTSのリーディングは全3つのパッセージ計40問から成り立っています。

リーディングの問題形式は全部で14あり、カテゴリー問題はそのうちのひとつです。

  1. True / False / Not Given問題
  2. パラグラフ選択問題
  3. 見出し選択問題
  4. タイトル選択問題
  5. カテゴリー問題
  6. 穴埋め問題
  7. 文章完成問題
  8. テーブル完成問題
  9. フローチャート完成問題
  10. ダイアグラム完成問題
  11. 文章完結問題
  12. 多肢選択問題
  13. リスト選択問題
  14. ショートアンサー

文章中から特定の事実を抜き出すタイプの問題です。 他のタイプと同様にパラフレーズが見抜けるかが鍵に気になります。

問題の特徴

以下はIELTSリーディングの「カテゴリー問題」のサンプルです。

1-4の特徴に当てはまるものをA-Dから選ぶというものですね。

1-4に書かれている内容が文章中でパラフレーズされていると考えてください。

IELTS側が試しているスキルは以下2点です。

  • 特定箇所の情報の読み取り
  • 情報の仕分け

求められている情報を拾って読み取れるかが試されますね

高スコアのコツ

IELTSリーディングの「カテゴリー問題」で高スコアを取得するためのコツは以下になります。

  • 選択肢の全てに先に目を通す
  • 鍵となるキーワードに線を引く
  • キーワードのパラフレーズを想像する
  • パラグラフ内にキーワードが出て来たら注意する

パッセージ全体に散らばっているのではなく特定箇所に答えがあることが多いです

実践問題

それではIELTSリーディングの「カテゴリー問題」の実践問題を解いてみましょう。

THE TYRANNY OF CHOICE

A
Americans today choose among more options in more parts of life than has ever been possible before. To an extent, the opportunity to choose enhances our lives. It is only logical to think that if some choices are good, more is better; people who care about having infinite options will benefit from them, and those who do not can always just ignore the 273 versions of cereal they have never tried. Yet recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is wrong, with 5% lower percentage announcing they are happy. Although some choices are undoubtedly better than none, more is not always better than less.

B
Recent research offers insight into why many people end up unhappy rather than pleased when their options expand. We began by making a distinction between “maximizers” (those who always aim to make the best possible choice) and “satisficers” (those who aim for “good enough,” whether or not better selections might be out there).

C
In particular, we composed a set of statements—the Maximization Scale—to diagnose people’s propensity to maximize. Then we had several thousand people rate themselves from 1 to 7 (from “completely disagree” to “completely agree”) on such statements as “I never settle for second best.” We also evaluated their sense of satisfaction with their decisions. We did not define a sharp cutoff to separate maximizers from satisficers, but in general, we think of individuals whose average scores are higher than 4 (the scale’s midpoint) as maxi- misers and those whose scores are lower than the midpoint as satisficers. People who score highest on the test—the greatest maximizers— engage in more product comparisons than the lowest scorers, both before and after they make purchasing decisions, and they take longer to decide what to buy. When satisficers find an item that meets their standards, they stop looking. But maximizers exert enormous effort reading labels, checking out consumer magazines and trying new products. They also spend more time comparing their purchas​ing decisions with those of others.

D
We found that the greatest maximizers are the least happy with the fruits of their efforts. When they compare themselves with others, they get little pleasure from finding out that they did better and substantial dissatisfaction from finding out that they did worse. They are more prone to experiencing regret after a purchase, and if their acquisition disappoints them, their sense of well-being takes longer to recover. They also tend to brood or ruminate more than satisficers do.

E
Does it follow that maximizers are less happy in general than satisficers? We tested this by having people fill out a variety of questionnaires known to be reliable indicators of well‐ being. As might be expected, individuals with high maximization scores experienced less satisfaction with life and were less happy, less optimistic and more depressed than people with low maximization scores. Indeed, those with extreme maximization ratings had depression scores that placed them in the borderline of clinical range.

F
Several factors explain why more choice is not always better than less, especially for maximisers. High among these are “opportunity costs.” The quality of any given option cannot be assessed in isolation from its alternatives. One of the “costs” of making a selection is losing the opportunities that a different option would have afforded. Thus, an opportunity cost of vacationing on the beach in Cape Cod might be missing the fabulous restaurants in the Napa Valley. Early Decision Making Research by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed that people respond much more strongly to losses than gains. If we assume that opportunity costs reduce the overall desirability of the most preferred choice, then the more alternatives there are, the deeper our sense of loss will be and the less satisfaction we will derive from our ultimate decision.

G
The problem of opportunity costs will be better for a satisficer. The latter’s “good enough” philosophy can survive thoughts about opportunity costs. In addition, the “good enough” standard leads to much less searching and inspection of alternatives than the maximizer’s “best” standard. With fewer choices under consideration, a person will have fewer opportu​nity costs to subtract.

H
Just as people feel sorrow about the opportunities they have forgone, they may also suffer regret about the option they settled on. My colleagues and I devised a scale to measure proneness to feeling regret, and we found that people with high sensitivity to regret are less happy, less satisfied with life, less optimistic and more depressed than those with low sensitivity. Not surprisingly, we also found that people with high regret

Look at the following descriptions or deeds (Questions 1-4) and the list of
catego​ries below.

Match each description or deed with the correct category, A-D. Write the correct letter, A-D, in boxes 1-4 on your answer sheet.

  • A: maximizers
  • B: satisficers
  • C: neither “maximizers” nor “satisficers”
  • D: both “maximizers” and “satisficers”
  1. rated to the Maximization Scale of making choice
  2. don’t take much time before making a decision
  3. are likely to regret about the choice in the future
  4. choose the highest price in the range of purchase

解答

以下が回答になります。

  1. D
  2. B
  3. A
  4. C

解答説明

解答の該当箇所がパッセージのどこにあったか確認してみましょう。今回はパラグラフのCが鍵となりました。

Q1. rated to the Maximization Scale of making choice.

パラグラフC. In particular, we composed a set of statements—the Maximization Scale—to diagnose people’s propensity to maximize. (…) We did not define a sharp cutoff to separate maximizers from satisficers, but in general, we think of individuals whose average scores are higher than 4 (the scale’s midpoint) as maximisers and those whose scores are lower than the midpoint as satisficers.

パラグラフCにmaximizersとsatisficersの記述が見つけられますね

Q2. don’t take much time before making a decision.

パラグラフC. When satisficers find an item that meets their standards, they stop looking.

Q3. are likely to regret about the choice in the future.

We found that the greatest maximizers are the least happy with the fruits of their efforts. (…) They are more prone to experiencing regret after a purchase,…

Q4. choose the highest price in the range of purchase

答えの該当箇所の記載がない

答えの該当箇所がないため、maximizersもsatisficersも選ばないだろうと推測できますね

まとめ

IELTSリーディング「カテゴリー問題」の特徴は理解できましたか。

次の記事: 【穴埋め問題】IELTSリーディングの実践問題

キーワードを頭に入れた状態で該当箇所を見つけるようにパッセージを読み進めていくことがポイントになります。

英語の「今まで」と「これから」

最短で伸ばすならSolo

SoloはIELTSのスコアを最短で伸ばします。

自分だけで学習できる自信がない人は是非一度カウンセリングに来てみてね。

弊社のIELTSのプロ講師たちが待ってるよ。

Solo IELTS TOEFLサポートページ

0 Comments

Leave a reply

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 * が付いている欄は必須項目です

*

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?